ArchaeologicalTraces.org

ATPG Publications

This site uses cookies.

If you do not change your browser settings, you agree to it. Learn more

I understand

'Cookies' are small text files that are stored by the browser (for example, Internet Explorer or Safari) on your computer or mobile phone. They allow websites to store things like user preferences. You can think of cookies as providing a 'memory' for the website, so that it can recognise you when you come back and respond appropriately.

A visit to a page on this website may generate only first-party cookies - small amounts of text stored in the user's computer. By default, first-party cookies are allowed in every Web browser. If you were to disable first-party cookies, a Web site could not keep track of your activity as you move from page to page.

It is usually possible to stop your browser accepting cookies, or to stop it accepting cookies from a particular website.
All modern browsers allow you to change your cookie settings. You can usually find these settings in the 'options' or 'preferences' menu of your browser.

10_2020

ZANETTO, S. - The complex of St. Andrew and St. Peter the Elder's in Zadar (Croatia): the archaeology of standing building for the history of the early medieval city

AUTHOR

Serena Zanetto

CATEGORY

Article

LANGUAGE 

English

ABSTRACT

This paper aims to reconstruct the diachronic development of the complex of St. Andrew and St. Peter the Elder's in the city of Zadar, from the 5th to the 12th century AD. The stratigraphic analysis of elevations allowed to learn the origin of the complex as well as its architectural and functional changes over time, from house or storage to place of worship. Therefore, this study provides new elements for understanding the 'second life' of the Roman city in Late Antiquity and Early Middle Ages. Furthermore, the analysis of the constructive techniques of the St. Peter the Elder's Church, particularly of the planimetric typology with rectangular inscribed apses and the system of cross vaults, contributes to knowledge of the workforces with their technological background, highlighting the role of Zadar as a cultural crossroad in the Adriatic Sea during the Dark Ages, between Byzantins, Lombards, Carolingians and local constructive traditions.

 

_______________________________________________________________

PDF (not yet available)

 

INTRODUCTION

In the Adriatic regions, particularly in the city of Zadar in Croatia, different cultural influences overlapped between the 6th and 11th century AD. These regions are located between the Byzantine world, which was destined to carry on the ancient constructive traditions, and the continental European world, in which a collapse of the entire cycle of production of the construction industry occurred at the time. On the one hand, these regions are key to understanding the routes crossed by technological innovations, which lead, in the West, first to the Carolingian building sites and then to the Romanesque revolution. On the other hand, Zadar is an important site that could shed light on a coastal economic zone of the Mediterranean world, which in the Early Middle Ages seemed to be vital. In addition, the most important matches between the two empires occur here, and this central role of Zadar and of Dalmatia is well reflected in the architecture, which displays different cultural inputs.

The specific case analysed here, the architectural complex of St. Andrew and St. Peter the Elder's in Zadar, is an example of functional transformation of a sector of the ancient city linked with the new economic, political, and social dynamics taken over from the Early Middle Age. By rereading past investigations and employing a stratigraphic analysis of the standing buildings, the evolution of the complex from the Late Antiquity until the Modern Age was determined, along with document elements of continuity with the ancient city. A new interpretation of its stratigraphic sequence is possible, and by comparing the constructive techniques with other architectural contexts, the site can become part of a wider debate about early medieval architecture, different technological backgrounds, and geographies of power.

In this paper, the 1960s’ interpretation of constructive phases and chronologies of the complex are revised. Then, the constructive techniques are examined to collect elements to date the interventions and to better understand the workforces engaged in the different building sites. The plan and the vaults of St. Peter the Elder's are specifically discussed because they represent original and significant products for the history of constructive techniques.

This context is not only an expression of constructive techniques overlapping in time, but it also represents a window to the changes occurring in Zadar during the Early Middle Age and could be a key to reading a parallel historical processes that involves the entire Dalmatia and the Adriatic regions. 

 

THE STRATIGRAPHIC SEQUENCE

The churches of St. Andrew and St. Peter the Elder's are located at the crossroads between a cardo and decumano minor of the ancient city, within walking distance of the episcopal complex. Together, they make an architectural complex consisting of two buildings: the church of St. Peter the Elder's to the E and the church of St. Andrew to the W (Fig. 1). These buildings are featured by a long stratigraphic sequence, which includes important early medieval interventions. In addition, the case study is an example of functional conversion of previous buildings arisen inside the Roman settlement and later transformed into a place for Christian worship. Other interesting aspects include the type of plan and the system of vaults in the eastern building, which are peculiar of the regional architecture of the time. 

 

Fig. 1 - Zadar, church of St. Andrew and St. Peter the Elder's. Localization of the complex at the crossroads with a cardo and decumano minor of the ancient city.

 

The first studies, dating to the end of the 19th century, were undertaken by Federico Bianchi (1877), Lorenzo Benevenia (1890), T. G. Jackson (1887), and Giovanni Smirich (1894: 21).

Excavations were carried out during the restoration works realized by the Jugoslovenski institut za zaštitu spomenika kulture, between 1961 and 1963. These essays brought to light some fragments of an early medieval liturgical furnishing, apparently belonging to the church of St. Peter. An ossuary tomb was discovered outside [1], and two layers of paintings were documented in the vaults and apsidal basin of St. Peter and in the apse of St. Andrew.

These discoveries were published only in 1970 by Ivan Petricioli and Svetislav Vučenović, directors of the excavation and restoration works. In their paper, they propose a stratigraphic analysis of the standing buildings, accompanied by sections, planimetries, and prospects that simultaneously show the different constructive phases. Despite the remarkable methodological approach, innovative for those years, there are some weak points in the sequence. However, no one discusses these sequences any longer, preferring instead to concentrate the debate on the chronology of the interventions, the liturgical furnishing, or the function of the eastern building (Goss 1987; Jurković 1997: 77-80; ibidem 2002: 197-205; Jakšić 2009: 61-93, 82-85; Marasović 2009) [2].

A review of the 1970 interpretation is presented here. This review highlights the critical points and proposes a different solution to the stratigraphic sequence, as well as some new chronologies.

 

The stratigraphic sequence in the Petricioli-Vučenovićs' interpretation of 1970

According to Petricioli-Vučenovićs' interpretation (Petricioli et al. 1970), the western church, which was partially rebuilt in the 17th century and dedicated to St. Andrew, is more ancient then the eastern one, and its foundation dates to the 5th or 6th century.

The eastern building was added just after the western one and originally was a sacristy; only later, during the 8th or 9th century was this last converted into a church dedicated to St. Peter, by creating two apses in the eastern side and building a system of vaults that divides the room into two aisles. In the end, the two buildings were decorated with frescoes, while the two entrances opening in the apse of St. Andrew were added later.

The dedication to St. Peter, which has appeared in written sources since 818 AD (Bianchi 1887: 380; Benevenia 1890: 99)[3], originally referred to both churches. In addition, at the beginning of the 12th century, the church became St. Peter 'the Elder's' because a new church was built in Zadar with the same dedication. After the partially rebuilding of the western building, and its consecration to St. Andrew in 1684 (Petriocioli et al. 1970: 182; Vežić 2015: 152-153), two different dedications were made, and consequently, only the eastern church kept the original dedication to St. Peter.

 

1 - The western building (today St. Andrew) is more ancient than the eastern one (today St. Peter the Elder's)

Petricioli and Vučenović argue that the western building is more ancient than the eastern one because Smirich, during the excavations in the apse of St. Andrew, saw that the foundations were unexpectedly deep (Smirich 1894: 22-23)[4], without any other indication; however, in the Smirich's interpretation the earlier building is the eastern one.

The two scholars then observed traces of a single pitch roof in the exterior of this apse (Fig. 2), which they attributed to the eastern building built later and leaning against the St. Andrew church. However, the roof may have been simply rebuilt when the entire sector was transformed with the addition of the new western church. Moreover, the traces consist of fragments of schist englobed in the apse, belonging to a single or two pitch roof, which therefore would be more ancient than or contemporary to the church of St. Andrew.

 

Fig. 2 - Zadar, apse of St. Andrew. Fragment of schist englobed in the external side, originally belonging to a roof.

 

Another element that contrasts with their interpretation is that the apse has no windows, except for a small square opening situated in a marginalized position in the upper part of the wall, exactly over the embedded traces of the roof. Thus, the apse was designed when the eastern building already existed, or during its construction, and the window was inserted in the only place the apse could be directly illuminated from the outside.

Moreover, along the south wall of the church of St. Peter, in the narrow space behind this semi-circular apse, there is a walled suspended entrance to which belonged two stones shelves still in situ. These stones could originally have had to support a wooden balcony or a staircase that surely were previous to the apse (Fig. 3).

 

Fig. 3 - Zadar, St. Peter the Elder's. Aerial entrance closed in the south perimeter wall, shown by inside (first period).

 

Finally, the planimetry of the complex shows a clearly visible anomaly created by the south perimeter wall of the church of St. Peter, which partially incorporates for a few meters the western building and maintains the same thickness until the end, where is abruptly interrupted. Petricioli and Vučenović do not deny that this south wall could be more ancient than the church of St. Peter and could be dated even to the Late Antiquity (Petricioli et al. 1970: 186; Vežić 2015: 157).

 

2 - The western church (today St. Andrew) dated to the 5th or 6th century

The dating to the 5th or 6th century is not based on strong arguments, but rather on the constructive techniques and on Smirich's affirmation about a possible and generic antiquity of the St. Andrew church because of the depth of its foundations. 

However, an early medieval fragment of a liturgical furnishing decorated with weave pattern, walled in the right jamb of the apse and partially covered by two layers of plaster, one with frescoes, lowers the chronology of this building [5] (Fig. 4). Also the stone shelf on which rests the triumphal arch, that is the same as those used to rest the vaults in the back building, indicates the same thing.

 

 

Fig. 4 - Zadar, St. Andrew. Fragment of liturgical furnishing dated to the Early Middle Ages, walled in the jamb of the triumphal arch  (on the lower-right and in detail - a) and shelf identical to those of the vaults in St. Peter the Elder's (on the right - b).

 

Furthermore, the imprecision of the apse basin does not have any confront in the Late Antiquity, but it seems to be chronologically later.

 

3 - The eastern building was converted from sacristy to church by adding two apses and a system of vaults

According to the 1970 interpretation, the two rectangular inscribed apses and the cross vaults were realized at the same time, during a renovation of the eastern building, which was converted into a church possibly between the 8th and 9th centuries.

Instead, some elements suggest the existence of two interventions distant in time. These interventions consist first of the construction of the two apses with their basins and, later, also of the vaults that divide the room in two aisles. The elements are:

- The apsidal basins are lower than and out of proportion to the vaults, and the constructive technique is more imprecise because it used fewer provisional wooden supports during the construction;

- The constructive technique of the wall that divides the apses is characterized by imprecise masonry, which uses smaller stones than those of the pillars leaning against the perimeter walls; therefore, the edges are irregular and tapered;

- The vaults rest on the dividing wall of the apses apparently by breaking it, so they seem to have been added later;

- The vault supports are coeval with a floor, which is 20 cm higher than the ancient one maintained inside the church of St. Peter the Elder's [6]; in addition, one semi-pillar was built leaning against a fragment of the more ancient enclosure of the presbytery, which is preserved in situ precisely for this reason (Fig. 5);

 

Fig. 5 - Zadar, St. Peter the Elder's. Semi-pillar of the system of vaults of the fourth period, built upon the more ancient presbytery enclosure of the second period.

 

- The fragments of schist incorporated in the apse of St. Andrew testify to an older phase for the eastern building, previous to the construction of the vaults but contemporary with the construction of the two apses or with the building site of the new western church

 

4 - The entrances opened on the apse of St. Andrew were inserted later

According to Patricioli-Vučenović, originally the two adjacent buildings were not connected, and the two entrances of the apse were built in the Baroque Age by breaking the wall and removing pieces of the fresco that consequently were absent in those points.

Currently, only one of the entrances is preserved, the south one, but the north one is still visible in some historical photographs (Serra 1930: 535) and reproduced in drawings from the 1970s. One does not observe traces of voluntary removal of the frescoes, which are preserved now only in the apsidal basin. Furthermore, interfaces indicating the break of the wall for the addition of the south entrance are absent. One column of the system of vaults, moreover, leans against a jamb of this entrance (Fig. 6).

 

Fig. 6 - Zadar, apse of St. Andrew. Column leaning against a jamb of the entrance that connect the two churches, and walled holy water font.

 

In addition, Smirich, who made some excavation essays on the apses at the end of the 19th century, discovered the remains of an ancient passage deep under the south entrance (Smirich 1894: 22-23). This discovery suggests that the entrance was closed in the past, possibly substituted by other lateral entrances, and then re-opened after the apse had been painted.  Also, a holy water font walled in the exterior of the apse, on the side of the entrance and just beyond the column (Fig. 6), could be explained by the existence of a passage for the priests directly from the apse; maybe a second entrance on the north perimeter wall, now partially rebuilt, was destined for the laity instead [7].

The existence of this direct connection between the two churches is another indication that the church of St. Peter the Elder's is the most ancient of the two.

 

5 - Before the 17th century the architectural complex was entirely dedicated to St. Peter

According to the theory that originally the complex was entirely dedicated to St. Peter, different dedications for the two buildings were introduced only after the reconstruction and consecration of the western church, entitled to St. Andrew in 1684. The conversion of the dedication from St. Peter to St. Peter the Elder's, in the 12th century, was instead a consequence of building a new church in Zadar with the same dedication [8].

This hypothesis is derived from the idea that the western church is the most ancient and would explain why the dedication to St. Peter is maintained only in the eastern building.

Another more plausible possibility is that this dedication originally belonged exclusively to the eastern church, which became St. Peter the Elder's when the new western church was built. Therefore, this western church would be the St. Peter the New, until its reconstruction and its new dedication in the 16th [9].

 

A new interpretation of the stratigraphic sequence of the complex

After a thorough revision of the drawings published in 1970, and after a stratigraphic analysis of the standing buildings realized on the field, a new architectural sequence and new chronologies have been proposed. This new interpretation has shed light on the development of this sector of the city in one of the most dark periods of its history.
 

First period

The eastern and southern perimeter walls of the church of St. Peter the Elder's represent the most ancient remains of the complex and are characterized by a series of openings, later closed, referable to a ground level, which is 40 cm lower than the modern floor.

On the external eastern prospect, one can observe an arched window walled on the ground level and three arched windows in the first level. These last windows were partially rebuilt in 1957, after a sudden collapse of the upper part of the wall[10].

In the south perimeter wall (Fig. 8.2), one can observe the infill of an entrance on the ground floor. The threshold was found during the excavations of the 1960s, while in the upper level, there is a window and a suspended entrance. This entrance was equipped with stone shelves to support a wooden balcony or a staircase, and it was built by breaking the wall 2.90 m above the ancient ground floor (therefore 2.50 m above the paved floor exposed at present).

Moreover, removal traces in the most ancient walls, documented in the 1970 drawings and still visible in the exterior southeast corner, allow one to imagine a more articulated planimetry, maybe constituted by one or more adjacent buildings projected toward an open area along the cardo, from which it was possible to directly access both on the first floor of the buildings and on the ground floor (Fig. 7.1 and 9.1).

 

 

Fig. 7 - Zadar, churches of St. Andrew and St. Peter the Elder's. Hypothetical evolution of the complex in plant.

 

 

 

Fig. 8 - Zadar, church of St. Peter the Elder's. Internal prospect of the perimeter walls with constructive phases (drawings overlapped by Petricioli and Vučenović 1970).

 

Fig. 9 - Zadar, churches of St. Andrew and St. Peter the Elder's. Reconstruction of the hypothetical development of the complex.

 

The low elevations, compared to the modern paved road, as well as the presence of more phases visible in these walls, suggest a very high chronology. The archaeological excavations realized between 1961 and 1963 by Petricioli and Vučenović brought to light the Roman structures to more than 1 m from the floor of the church, at a level close to those of the first period. Therefore, it is possible that the most ancient phases of the church of St. Peter the Elder's belong to buildings rise inside the insula of the Roman city, in the Antiquity or Late Antiquity.

The fragment of funerary stele found englobed in the external side of the south perimeter wall (Petricioli et al.: 195) [11], indicating that the use of spolia was already widespread, suggests the structures were 4th to 5th century. This dating confirms the directors of the excavation theory. Many years later, Vežić also embraced this theory (Vežić 2015: 158-159).

 

Second period

In the open space overlooking the cardo, a room with a slightly irregular planimetry was created by building a perimeter wall that closes the space toward the north and runs parallel to the street [12] (Fig. 7.2). At the same time, doors and windows on the most ancient walls were definitely closed, and a new paved floor was realized 40 cm above the previous levels.

Furthermore, the presbytery was equipped with a stone enclosure of which a fragment is still preserved in situ, containing the niches to insert small vertical supports; other pieces discovered during the excavations, consisting of fragments of the architrave and tympanum, have been attributed to this enclosure.

Two rectangular inscribed apses were obtained in the eastern sector by adding a central wall with a niche on the frontal side and by reinforcing the lateral walls (Fig. 8.3). The apsidal basins, characterized by an irregular shape, were linked with the partially rebuilt perimeter wall by means of small squinches that allow the passage from a square to a half-dome (Fig. 10).

 

Fig. 10 - Zadar, St. Peter the Elder's. Squinch on the corner of the north apsidal basin.

 

At the same time, the three windows of the upper level of the eastern wall were closed or defunctionalized, while the presbytery might have been raised by a step and by a second step in the apses[13].

One can also hypothesize that the room was possibly shorter and lower than the previous building (Fig. 9.2).

These interventions turned an open space, delimited by a series of pre-existing buildings, into a church. Most scholars have argued that it was the most ancient church preserved in elevation of the entire Dalmatia, dated to the 7th or 8th century (Jackson 1887: 261-263; Canali 2010: 362; Serra 1930: 535). The fragments of a liturgical furnishing, such as a vertical support conserved in the Archaeological Museum of Zadar attributed just to this church, have been dated to the 9th century by Petricioli and Vučenović (Petricioli et al.: 194-195) and recently by Vežić (2015: 29-30). This hypothetical dating has led other scholars to propose the same chronology for the church of St. Peter the Elder's (Jakšić 2009; Jurković 2001: 165), while in other cases, the building has been generally interpreted as 'pre-Romanesque', without offering a more precise dating[14]. According to Vladimir Goss (1987), the building would be an architecture of 11th century, instead. In other papers, Jurković (1997: 203-204) partially embraced this opinion and hypothesized that it is an external crypt obtained inside more ancient buildings during the 11th century. This external crypt theory has also been accepted by Vežić (2015: 161-162). 

After the publication of Petricioli and Vučenović, which changed the interpretation accepted until then, the idea that the western building dated to the 5th or 6th century and was more ancient than the eastern one was not discussed but was uncritically accepted. Moreover, also the idea that the eastern church was the result of two constructive phases, consisting of the construction of the perimeter walls and the enclosure of the presbytery and then of the construction of apses and vaults, was unanimously accepted.

However, the construction of apses and system of vaults occurring in two distinct moments, rather than inside the same building site, would have created confusion between the scholars, producing incoherent chronologies and the absence of comparisons.

The construction of a first place of worship, consisting of a room with two inscribed rectangular apses and of an enclosure of the presbytery, occurred in the Early Middle Ages. While the fragments of the liturgical furnishing have been dated to the 9th century, the typology of planimetry is attested from the century before.

Generally, early medieval churches (dated between the 8th and 10th centuries) with two apses are documented in Veneto, particularly in the area of Vicenza (Colecchia 2009). Another example in the Upper Adriatic Sea is represented by the church of St. Platone in the Cres island (Čaušević-Bully 2013), while other more distant comparisons are in Lombardia, Piemonte (Garofano 2002: 159-162; Piva 2001), Switzerland (Sennhauser 2003: 117-118; 185-189; ibidem: 929), and the Byzantine Empire[15].

The examples are numerous, but until the 10th century, only the second church of St. Peter of Rosà (10th or 11th century), near Vicenza, also had a double aisle (Colecchia 2009: 303-307). In this case, however, apses and aisles had different widths [16].

The total absence of comparisons for churches with two apses and two aisles during the 8th and 9th centuries is an additional confirmation of the original absence of the vaults in the church of St. Peter the Elder's in Zadar.

More direct comparisons of churches with two rectangular inscribed apses are located in Istria: St. Mary little of Bale, dated between the end of the 8th and 9th centuries [17], and the second phase of St. Cecilia of Guran, dated generically post 7th and 8th centuries (Terrier et al.: 2014; 2013; 2012; 2011; 2010).

Therefore, this building site could be dated between the second half of the 8th century and the beginning of the 9th century and its liturgical furnishing would be more generally of the 9th century. From a broader point of view, this building could be part of the wide phenomenon of inscribed apses in the Upper Adriatic Sea from the 8th century, which is discussed later.

 

Third period

A new wider church was built immediately in the west, with a semi-circular free apse and a rectangular room of about 11x5 m (Fig. 7.3 and 9.3). 

Partially rebuilt during the 17th century, and dedicated to St. Andrew, this church could coincide with the supposed St. Peter the New. Only the apse and the south perimeter wall, 5 meters high, remain of the original building.

In the same building site, the entire western space of the ancient church was transformed, and a building with a double pitched roof that enveloped the semi-circular apse was built to connect the two churches. The only window open in this apse was located in the lateral upper part, which was the only point from which the church could be directly illuminated from outside. An entrance coinciding with the present one would guarantee a direct connection between the two buildings. Some steps found during the 1960s excavations were situated between the semi-circular apse and the south perimeter wall of the ancient building (Petricioli et al.: 1970). These steps, moreover, could be coeval and would also demonstrate the presence of a direct connection outside.

These interventions would have determined a functional change of the more ancient church and the indication 'St. Peter the Elder's' could spread from that moment. The presence of a holy water font walled in the external wall of the apse (Fig. 6) to the north of the entrance, and compatible with the elevations of the second period, indicates that the first church’s function as place of worship remained; however, it could have been converted into a place to keep the relics, according to a hypothesis by Jurković (2002: 203-205).

Elements necessary for absolute dating do not exist, but some clues suggest a chronology of the end of 10th or 11th century:

- a carved fragment of the early medieval liturgical furnishing, dated to the 9th century, re-used in the wall of the right jamb of the apse, which represents a generic terminus post quem;

- the shelves of stone of the apse are the same as those used to realize the later system of vaults;

- from the 12th century in the written sources the indication «veteris» appears (Vežić 2015: 152), but it is absent in a testament from 918 A.D., which named only one church dedicated to St. Peter in Zadar[18];

- if the functional interpretation of the eastern building is exact, the external crypts spread only during the 11th century (Jurković 2002: 203);

- the close correlation between these interventions and those of the following fourth period, which different clues suggest date to the same century.

 

Fourth period

The following building sites carries on the same program of spatial redefining, which consists of the construction of a new church in the west as well as of the transformation of the back building to an external crypt.

In the fourth period, the ancient church was raised and extended by breaking down the connection to the forepart and entirely incorporating the apse of the St. Peter the New.

The most determining intervention consisted of a system of small cross vaults dividing the eastern  room into three aisles, each with four square bays (including those behind the semi-circular apse) (Fig. 7.4 and 9.4).

In addition, the room was totally repaved, reaching the same elevation of the presbytery sector, 20 cm above the previous floor. Only the steps inside the apses were maintained[19].

After closing the western entrance connected to the outside with a transversal wall, a new entrance was opened along the south perimeter wall, together with a small square window (Fig. 8.1).

The window of the semi-circular apse, after losing its original function, was closed from inside, maybe due to the lowering of the apsidal basin. This intervention is deducible from some visible anomalies in the triumphal arch and in the section drawing by Petricioli and Vučenović, which illustrates the window was built just at the level of the basin’s curve (Petricioli et al. 1970).

These interventions allow to redefine the external crypt, according to the canons of the vaulted chambers that spread during the 11th century. Of these vaulted chambers, the crypt of the cathedral of Zadar is the closest  example.

Furthermore, the constructive techniques of the system of vaults, discussed in the next section, suggest this dating.

The last dating clue is the reuse of a carved fragment maybe belonging to the presbytery enclosure of the 9th century, which is walled at the base of one of the sub-arches of the vaults, in the space behind the semi-circular apse, near the south corner.

 

THE CONSTRUCTIVE TECHNIQUES

Planimetries with inscribed apese: circulation and translation of models

After reviewing the existing literature, maps have been produced on the spread of the different typologies of churches with inscribed apses in the Upper Adriatic Sea and Dalmatia. Then, comparisons have been sought outside the considered area.

Although many chronologies are still uncertain, and the consulted literature cannot be considered complete, a preliminary and coherent picture is possible. 

The first distinction has been made between semi-circular inscribed apses, which are the most widespread, and rectangular inscribed apses. Then, another distinction has been made based on the number of apses.

The first example of a church with three aisles, and three semi-circular inscribed apses, is the St. Elena's chapel in Jerusalem, dated to the 4th century, from which the typology spread in Syria in the 6th and 7th centuries (Bianchi 2007: 70-75). The same typology is documented then in Switzerland since the beginning of the 9th century[20], in Zalavar (Hungary) in the second half of the 9th century (Mordovin 2006) and, from the middle of the 10th century, also in the Netherlands, for instance, in the church of Saints Peter and Paolo of Oosterbeek (Oswald et al.: 245-246).

Between the first Palestinian and Syrian examples with three aisles, and those spread in the European continent with a single aisle, there are the church of St. Vigilio of Palse, in Friuli (Villa 2003: 553, 572), the church of St. Maurus in Poreč (Matejčić 2001) and the second phase of St. Sophia of Dvigrad, in Istria ( Brogiolo et al., 2003). All these churches have a single aisle and date to the 8th century[21] (Fig. 11).

 

Fig. 11 - Spread of the churches with three semicircular inscribed apses, in the Upper and Middle Adriatic Sea.

 

Instead, outside the considered area, the typology with rectangular inscribed apses seems to not be documented[22], except for some Syrian basilicas of the 6th century[23]. In addition to the churches with two apses (Fig. 12), like St. Mary Little in Bale and St. Cecilia in Guran, the typology with three apses in Istria is documented in the early Middle Ages[24] (Fig. 13), and its prototype could be the Lombard temple of Santa Maria in Valle of Cividale, in Friuli (760 A.C.). In the 9th century, this last typology also spread to the Dalmatian hinterland, in the Croatian dukes' and princes' estates, in association with basilical planimetries[25]. However, this typology is particularly known in the Istrian region and generally in the Upper Adriatic Sea, where the Lombards ruled for some time.

 

 

Fig. 12 - Spread of the churches with two rectangular inscribed apses in the Upper and Middle Adriatic Sea.

 

 

Fig. 13 - Spread of the churches with three rectangular inscribed apses in the Upper and Middle Adriatic Sea.

 

A suggestive hypothesis is that the spread of planimetries with inscribed apses in the Upper Adriatic Sea, from the 8th century, is connected to the Byzantine Iconoclasm, which caused the run of masons together with artists and artisans. Effectively, the typology is documented in the regions that do not adhere to the Iconoclasm, like the Lombard duchy of Friuli, the Byzantine Istria that depends on Ravenna or, from the 9th century, the Croatian principality ruled by the Carolingian dynasty. Planimetries with inscribed apses are not documented, instead, in the Byzantine Dalmatia that depends on the iconoclastic patriarch of Constantinople.

For such reasons, the church of St. Peter the Elder's represents a singular building in that coastal region, possibly realized during the iconoclastic crisis and expression of a technological background comparisons of which have to be sought in the Upper Adriatic Sea.

 

The system of vaults

The ceiling of the church of St. Peter the Elder's consists of small cross vaults realized upon formwork and characterized by strong sub-arches. The supports consist of semi-pillars leaning against the perimeter walls and of one pillar and two columns free in the centre (Fig. 14, 15).

Fig. 14 - Zadra, St. Peter the Elder's. Apses of the second period with the impost of the vaults of fourth period.

 

Fig. 15 - Zadar, St. peter the Elder's. System of vaults of fourth period.

 

In Dalmatia, in the estates of the Croatian dukes and princes where the Carolingian influence is strong, the constructive tradition of the pillars prevailed throughout the 9th century and stayed alive in the 11th century[26]. In addition, in the coastal Dalmatia, the monumental rotunda of St. Donatus in Zadar, with its columns built with spolia, is an exceptional building site, where local masons likely worked together with allochthonous workers.

From the 11th century, while the great basilicas spread again in all the Upper Adriatic Sea, and an important and standardized production of capitals, shafts, and column basis newly began[27], in the coastal Dalmatia one can observe the progressive spread of the columns. For the entire 11th century, however, these columns were essentially made with reused Roman or Late Antique building materials. The closest examples are the churches of St. Laurence and of St. Dominic in Zadar, as well as the crypt of the Cathedral. In the regional area, the St. Martin's church in Traù, or the basilica of Saint Euphemia are other examples.

In addition to the presence of the columns, the other special feature of the vaults of St. Peter the Elder's are the sub-arches, which are a structural element elaborated in the regions of the Byzantine Empire. These sub-arches made it possible to build self-bearing cross vaults and to continuously reuse the same formwork, thus saving on the cost of the wood.

In the West, the sub-arches of the vaults seem not to arrive before the 11th century. It is significant that the first systems of vaults of the hall crypts, dated to the end of the 10th and the beginning of the 11th centuries, do not have these constructive elements and consist instead of crossed barrel vaults of different heights or not perfectly closed in the centre[28]. The system of vaults in the crypt of the Cathedral of Zadar belongs just to this last typology. However, in the 11th century, in Croatia, the sub-arches spread and can be observed in the St. Laurence of Zadar, or in the St. Martin of Traù. In Istria, these structural elements are in the only hall crypt of the region, which is the church of St. Pelagius in Novigrad, and in the episcopal complex of Poreč in front of the trichora, where they probably had to support a higher level.

However, there is a singular characteristic of the sub-arches of the St. Peter the Elder's: along the perimeter walls, they are not supported by stone shelves or semi-columns, as in all the other examples, but by semi-pillars[29]. We still know little about the architecture developed in the Croatian principalities since the 9th century, and the remains sufficiently conserved in elevation are few. However, the long tradition of pillars in these regions of the Dalmatian hinterland suggest that the typology of the vault system of the St. Peter the Elder's derived from here.

 

ZADAR: A CROSSROADS IN THE ADRIATIC SEA

The application of the stratigraphic method in the study of the architecture, together with the analysis of the constructive techniques, has allowed one to follow the development of a small urban context in a diachronic way. New elements have been provided to investigate the transformation and reorganization of the city since the Late Antiquity; these elements are even more important because relating to a settlement where, because of the absence of extensive archaeological excavations, and because of too invasive restorations, it has not been possible to document the Early Medieval phases (Majocchi 2010).

The analysis of the complex of St. Andrew and St. Peter the Elder's demonstrates a settlement continuity and the maintenance of the urban scheme gave by the ancient cardi and decumani, together with a progressive, but controlled, growth of the ground level.

If the 'structural pattern' of the city does not change, as the maintenance of the ancient streets demonstrates, what changes is the 'significance' of the urban spaces. One can observe the functional conversion of some areas of the city, which in the case under examination consists of the transformation of a house into a place of Christian worship.

However, the critical revision of the stratigraphic analysis realized in the 1970s would postpone the radical functional transformation of this urban sector by almost two centuries. The fragment of a funerary stele, walled in the most ancient structures, suggests a date of the first period of the complex to the 4th or 5th century, or even later. Furthermore, the opening of an aerial entrance and other interventions in the pre-existing walls indicate a prolonged use of this building as house or storage.

A functional and structural transformation occurred only from the second half of the 8th to the beginning of the 9th century, when a church was obtained in the free space along the cardo minor.

The technological background of the workers engaged in this building site seem to have more contact with the regions of the Upper Adriatic Sea than the Byzantine area. Constructive techniques, planimetry and sculptural furnishing indeed are the same as the coeval architecture of Istria and northeast Italy. Moreover, the presence of a Lombard component in Dalmatia, also before the Carolingian one, had been recognized by scholars in the sculptures of the maestro degli amboni zaratini, working between the second half of the 8th and the first years of the 9th century in Zadar and Pridraga (Josipović 2016).  

In the city of Zadar, another imposing building site of crucial importance soon began: the rotunda of the Holy Trinity commissioned by the bishop Donatus, possibly as a crowning of the Aachen Treaty of 812, which diplomatically regulated the influence sphere of Byzantines and Carolingians in the Adriatic Sea. The building site involved allochthonous workers, almost certainly of Byzantine provenance, and maybe local masons. The instruments and technical skills to lift high columns and install the large squared stones of the pillars, then finished on site, as well as the planning complexity behind the entire building, characterized by golden proportions and complicated geometries, both belong to a technological background only existing in the Byzantine Empire. However, if specialized workers worked on the most important structural elements, the perimeter walls instead, characterized by irregular arrangements made of simply broken reused limestones, allow one to also hypothesize the activity of local masons on the building site. The masonry technique, as well as the irregularity of some planimetric drawings, suggest that these local workers exported the characteristic model of churches with radial apses to all the Dalmatia, along the coast as well as in the Croatian principalities of the hinterland, on the wave of the widespread rotundas also occurring in the West, starting from the 9th century. It is significant that just in the city of Zadar is preserved one of the most ancient churches with radial apses: St. Mary in Stomorica's church built just outside Roman and Early Medieval walls (Zanetto 2017: 138-142; 221-223).

As these few examples demonstrate, the boundary between the Roman-Byzantine Dalmatia and the Slavic one is unclear, either before or after the Aachen Treaty. Furthermore, during the 7th and 8th centuries, there was a progressive process of integration and pacific coexistence between the two worlds (Goldestein 2005). It even seems that the city of Zadar, during the entire Early Middle Ages, was a crossroads of different constructive traditions that interacted with a local substratum.

The system of vaults of St. Peter the Elder's, dated to the 11th century (fourth period), that put together pillars and reused columns, sub-arches and standardized cross vaults, represents the integration of many constructive techniques and technological backgrounds once again.

If the architecture can provide a reliable key to understanding the historical and economical processes, it can be said  that the city of Zadar represented a vital crossroads in the Adriatic Sea during the entire Early Middle Ages, despite the scarcity of monumental remains. However, the few material remains can enrich this picture further, but an archaeological approach, absolute datings, and analysis free from ideologies are needed.

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bianchi, B. (2007) Arabia e Palestina, dall'impero al califfato. Firenze: All'Insegna del Giglio.

Bianchi, C.F. (1887) Zara cristiana. Zadar: Tipografia Woditzka.

Benevenia, L. (1890) Scampoli di storia patria. Zadar: Tipografia Woditzka.

Bertelli, C., Brogiolo G.P. (eds.) (2001) Bizantini, Croati, Carolingi. Alba e tramonto di Regni e Imperi, Milano: Skira.

Brogiolo, G.P., Delogu, P. (eds.) (2005) L'Adriatico dalla tarda antichità all'età carolingia. Atti del convegno di Studi (Brescia 11-13 ottobre 2001), 195-211. Firenze: All'Insegna del Giglio.

Brogiolo, G.P., Malaguti, C., Riavez, P. (2003) Nuovi dati archeologici dallo scavo della chiesa di Santa Sofia e dell'insediamento di Dvigrad/Duecastelli. In: Cuscito G. (eds.) Il Friuli e l'Istria al tempo di San Paolino d'Aquileia. Antichità altoadriatiche 55, 115-150.

Canali, F. (2010) Architettura e città nella Dalmazia italiana (1922-1943). Quaderni del Centro di ricerche storiche di Rovigno, 21, 362.

Caselli, L. (eds.) (2009) San Pietro e San Marco. Arte e iconografia in area Adriatica. Roma: Gangemi, 61-93.

Čaušević-Bully, M., Bully, S. (2013) Esquisse d'un paysage monastique insulaire dans le nord de l'Adriatique: l'archipel du Kvarner (Croatie). Hortus Artium Medievalium, 19, 167-182.

Colecchia, A. (2009) Bassano del Grappa. In: Brogiolo, G. P., Ibsen, M. (eds.) Corpus Architecturae Religiosae Europeae (secc. IV-X), II. Zagreb: Printera, 273-280, 290

Coroneo, R. (2008) Problematica delle chiese biabsidate. Contributo allo studio del tipo in area tirrenica. In: Quintavalle, A. C. (eds.), Medioevo: arte e storia. Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Studi Parma, 18 - 22 settembre 2007. Milano: Electa, 47-60.

Dimitrokallis, F. (1976) Οί δίκογχοι χριστιανικοί ναοί. Athens.

Dorigo, W. (1995) Chiese venetiche altomedievali ad absidi inscritte. In: Farioli Campanati, R., Seminario internazionale sul tema. Ricerche di archeologia cristiana e bizantina, in memoria del prof. Giuseppe Bovini (Ravenna, 14-19 maggio 1995). Ravenna: Girasole, 289-310.

Garofano, A.G. (2002) Le chiese duali di età carolingia fra Istria e Italia settentrionale. Hortus Artium Medievalium, 8, 159-166.

Goldestein, I. (2005) Discontinuity/continuity in Croatian History from the Sixth to the Ninth century. In: Brogiolo, G. P., Delogu, P. (eds.) L'Adriatico dalla tarda antichità all'età carolingia. Atti del convegno di Studi (Brescia 11-13 ottobre 2001). Firenze: All'Insegna del Giglio, 195-211.

Goss, V.P. (1987) Early croatian architecture. A study of the Pre-Romanesque. London: Duckbacks.

Jackson, T.G. (1887) Dalmatia, the Quarnero and Istria, 3. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Jakšić, N. (2009) Il culto si San Pietro nella Dalmazia paleocristiana e medievale. In: Caselli, L. (eds.) San Pietro e San Marco. Arte e iconografia in area adriatica. Rome: Gangemi, 61-93.

Josipović, I.(2016) Il maestro degli amboni zaratini. Hortus Artium Medievalium, 22, 443-450.

Jurković, M. (1997) Sv. Petar Stari u Zadru i njegova kripta. Starohrvatska prosvjeta, III/24, 77-90

Jurković, M. (2001) Architettura dell’epoca carolingia. Bertelli, C., Brogiolo, G. P. (eds.): Bizantini, Croati, Carolingi, 151-173.

Jurković, M. (2002) La cripta esterna della chiesa di San Pietro il Vecchio a Zadar. In: Franco, T.,  Valenzano, G. (eds.), De lapidibus sententiae: scritti di storia dell'arte per Giovanni Lorenzoni. Padova: Il Poligrafo, 197-205.

Lassus, J. (1947) Sanctuaires chrétiens de Syrie. Paris: Persée

Majocchi, P. (2010) Le città europee nell’alto medioevo tra storia e archeologia (secoli V-X). Reti Medievali, 11/2, 183-196.

Marasović, T. (2009) Dalmatia praeromanica. Ranosrednjovjekovno graditeljstvo u Dalmaciji 2. Korpus arhitekture: Kvarner i Sjeverna Dalmacija. Zagabria: Arhitektonski fakultet Sveučilišta.

Matejčić, I. (2001) Parenzo. In: Bertelli, C., Brogiolo, G. P. (eds.), Bizantini, Croati, Carolingi. 347.

Mordovin, M. (2006) The building history of Zalavár-Récéskút Church. Annual of medieval studies at Central European University at the CEO, 12, 9-32.

Mortignoni, M. (2011) Alle origini di un tipo architettonico. Ipotesi sulle chiese a due navate e due absidi della Lunigiana alla luce dei dati archeologici. Quaderno della Scuola di Specializzazione in Beni Archeologici, 19. Bologna: Università di Bologna, 139-154.

Nothdurfter, H. (2001) Chiese tra VII e VIII secolo in Alto Adige. In: Brogiolo, G. P. (eds.), Le chiese rurali tra VII e VIII secolo in Italia settentrionale, 8° seminario sul tardo antico e sull'alto medioevo in Italia settentrionale (Garda, 8-10 aprile 2000). Mantova: SAP, 123-158.

Oswald, F., Schaefer, L., Sennhauser, H. R. (1966) Vorromanische Kirchenbauten. Monaco: Prestel Verlag.

Petricioli, I., Vučenović, S. (1970), Crve Sv. Andrija i Sv. Petra Stari u Zadru. Diadora, 5, 177-202.

Piva, P. (2001) Le due chiese di San Lorenzo a Quingentole: 'quadri' storici, tipologie architettoniche, contesti funzionali. In: Manicardi, A. (eds.), San Lorenzo di Quingentole: archeologia, storia ed antropologia. Documenti di archeologia, 25. Mantova: SAP, 115-144.

Sennhauser, H.R. (2003) Frühchristliche und frühmittelalterliche kirchliche Bauten in der Diözese Chur und in den nördlich un südlich angrenzenden Landschaften. In: Sennhauser, H. R. (eds.), Frühe Kirchen im östlichen Alpengebiet: Von der Spätantike bis in ottonische Zeit. München: Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 9-211.

Sennhauser, H.R. (2003a) Typen, Formen und Tendenzen im frühen Kirchenbau des östlichen Alpengebietes: Versuch einer Übersicht. In: Sennhauser, H. R. (eds.), Frühe Kirchen, 919-980.

Serra, L. (1930) Lavori di restauro e ripristino ai monumenti di Zara. Bollettino d'Arte, 9/12, 529-538.

Smirich, G. (eds.) (1894) S. Pietro vecchio in Zara. In: Vitaliani, L. (eds.) Ephemeris Bihačensis. Zadar: Apud L. Vitaliani & filios.

Terrier, T., Jurković, M., Marić, I. (2014) Aux confins de l’empire carolingien, les fouilles archéologiques de l’ancienne agglomération médiévale de Guran en Istrie (Croatie). Hortus Artium Medievalium, 20/1, 291-304.

Terrier, T., Jurković, M., Marić, (2013) Les sites de l'église Sainte-Cécile et de l'agglomération médiévale de Guran en Istrie (Croatie): onzième campagne de fouilles archéologiques. Hortus Artium Medievalium, 19, 357-366.

Terrier, T., Jurković, M., Marić, I. (2012) Les sites de l'église Sainte-Cécile et de l'ancienne agglomération de Guran en Istrie (Croatie): dixième campagne de fouilles archéologiques, Hortus Artium Medievalium, 18/2, 433-444.

Terrier, T., Jurković, M., Marić, I. (2011) Les sites de l’église Sainte-Cécile et de l’agglomération médiévale de Guran en Istrie (Croatie): neuvième campagne de fouilles archéologiques. Hortus Artium Medievalium, 17, 243-245.

Terrier, T., Jurković, M., Marić, I. (2010) Les sites de l’église Sainte-Cécile et de l’ancienne agglomération de Guran en Istrie (Croatie): huitième campagne de fouilles archéologiques. Hortus Artium Medievalium, 6, 233-246.

Vežić, P. (2015) Crkva Sv. Petra Starog i Bianchijeva edicola S. Marina u Zadru / St. Peter the Old’s Church and Bianchi’s edicola S. Marina in Zadar. Diadora, 29, 151-170.

Villa, L. (2003) Edifici di culto in Friuli tra l’età paleocristiana e l’Altomedioevo. In: Sennhauser, H. R. (eds.), Frühe Kirchen, 501-79.

Zanetto S.Z. (2017) Tradizioni costruttive nell'alto e medio Adriatico (secoli VII-XI. Eredità e innovazione nell'alto Medioevo. Firenze: All'Insegna del Giglio.

 
NOTES

[1] An earring of the 11th century, a small coin (not deciphered) and some other small finds were discovered in the ossuary covered by slabs (Petricioli et al. 1970: 177-202).

[2] Most recently only Pavuša Vežić has reviewed the sequence, however not changing the interpretation of 1970 (Vežić 2015: 151-170).

[3] Bianchi indicates the year 908, then corrected by Benevenia.

[4] T. G. Jackson (J1887:261-263) and Alessandro Dudan (1923), quoted in Canali (2010), p. 362) are of the same opinion.

[5] Vučenović and Petricioli interpret it as an improbable later addition.

[6] This paved floor stood at -90 cm from that of the Baroque age and was brought to light in the 1886 by Smirich, who reproduced it in his drawings (Vežić 2015: 155); in some historical photographs one can still observe the higher level of the floor, although partially covered with rubble (for instance Serra 1930: 534). During the restoration of the 1960s this floor was removed, reaching the previous levels of the church (at about -20 cm from the last), and discovering the basis of the supports for the vaults and a piece of the enclosure of the presbytery with the niches for the vertical supports.

[7] The hypothesis of the existence of entrances in the north side was already expressed by  Pavuša Vežić, who agrees however with Petricioli e Vučenović about the idea that the two building were not in communication (Vežić 2015: 165-166).

[8] About this church, Bianchi in the 1877 claims that was located in the main square of Zadar (in plateis magna), near the Loggia; he also writes that the same building in 1154 was promoted to 'collegiata' grade and then demolished in 1447 (Bianchi 1887: 383). The plateis magna would correspond to the Piazza del Popolo, a political centre of the city from the 1289 at least, located 140 m southern from the complex in exam.

[9] See the new interpretation proposed by Pavuša Vežić about the previous dedication to St. Marina of the eastern church (Vežić 2015: 166-7).

[10] Only the window on the left is original (Petricioli et al.: 183).

[11] Petricioli, Vučenović, 'Crve Sv. Andrija', p. 195. The funerary stele was coinciding with the third bay, but it has been removed; its exact location remains unknown.

[12] Because of the numerous interventions, the stratigraphic relations of this wall with the other structures are not visible and neither the masonry technique; the external wall facing has been completely rebuilt indeed, as well as many parts of the internal perimeter wall.

[13] The step of the presbytery sector possibly had the same height of the basis of the enclosure, while that of the apses hid the basis of the dividing central wall.

[14] Marasović, Dalmatia praeromanica, p. 327.

[15] Examples of churches with two apses are documented also in Asia Minor, Georgia, Armenia, Cyprus, Aegean Islands and Greece (Dimitrokallis 1976).

[16] Castelletto di Brenzone near Verone (ending of 8th-9th centuries) is characterized by two aisles of different width and by three free semicircular apses, all different between them (Garofano 2002: 159-161). Other examples, for instance from the Corsica, Sardegna or Lunigiana regions, where churches with two apses and two aisles are particularly numerous, dated to 11th-13th centuries (Mortignoni 2011; Coroneo 2008).

[17] This dating considers the most recent proposal of Garofano, who dates it to the Carolingian Age (Garofano 2002: 163-164).

[18] "Dimitto in S. Pietro uno savano de panno serico" (Benevenia 1890: 99; Bianchi 1887: 380).

[19] A Smirich's drawing of 1887 documents this paved floor and the steps of the two apses.

[20] The first examples are the parish church of Zillis dated to around the 800 A.C. (Sennhauser 2003: 203-204), the Carolingian churches of St. Agata and St. Marie of Disentis (Ibid.: 80-86) and the church of St. Luzi in the diocese of Coira of the first half of the 9th century (Ibid.: 72-73).

[21] Also the planimetry of the first cathedral of Cittanova-Eracliana, in the lagoon, was characterized by three semicircular and inscribed apses, but the chronology proposed by Dorigo (7th century) is uncertain (Dorigo 1995: 301-304)

[22] The only exception is the church of St. Benedict in Malles, Trentino, dated to the first half of the 8th century; however, in this case the apses are a kind of niches in the wall (Nothdurfter 2001: 127).

[23] For instance the basilicas of di Khirbet Teizin (585 d.C.) or the eastern basilica of Baqirha (546 d.C.) (Lassus1947: 63).

[24] In the 9th century the typology is documented also in the duomo of Muggia (Trieste) and in the church discovered under the duomo of Visinada.

[25] Like the basilica of St. Mary in Biskupija, near the city of Tenin, and in that of Koliane, in the territory of Split.

[26] Examples dated to the 9th century are the church of St. Martha of Biiači and the basilicas of Koljane and of St. Mary of Biskupija, near Tenin; for the centuries 10th-11th the church of St. Stephan of Gospin Otok (Salone), the St. Peter of Dubrovnik and the basilica of St. Mary in Stupovi, near Biskupija.

[27] Among the most significant building sites there are the Cathedral of Aquileia, the Cathedral of Torcello (Veneto e Friuli Venezia Giulia) and the parish church of Sveti Lovreč (Istria).

[28] For instance the crypts of the basilicas of Aquileia and San Marco in Venice, for which the stratigraphic analysis suggests a high chronology (Zanetto 2017: 11-44, 44-57)

[29] This also applies to the transversal arches; a significant example are the arches of the ambulatory of the St. John's church of Arbe.

ROMANO, L. - Heading west: consideratios on grave orientation in 3rd millennium BC Mesopotamia

AUTHORS
Licia Romano

CATEGORY
Article

LANGUAGE
English

ABSTRACT
The paper presents a survey of sub-pavement burials and cemetery graves from Early Dynastic sites aiming at highlighting the presence of meaningful patterns in the orientation of the graves. The archaeological evidence is then interpreted on the light of cuneiform sources. Pending further and more accurate archaeoastronomical analyses and notwithstanding a general variability in the Mesopotamian ED funerary practices, a “solar-based” interpretation of the burials’ orientation is proposed, and the preferred western orientation is tentatively connected with the sun-set on the basis both of the location of the Netherworld and of the chthonic aspects of the sun-god Utu/Shamash.

 

_______________________________________________________________

PDF (not yet available)

 

INTRODUCTION

Grave orientation is one of the elements, visible in the archaeological record, which might indicate aspects of the ancient funerary ritual practices. Though Mesopotamian archaeology is aided by cuneiform sources, few are the indications on the way in which funerals were carried out and graves realized during the 3rd mill. BC. For example, Lagash texts inform us on the élite ritual and on some aspects of the celebrations related to the death of important members of the society that are relevant from the administrative point of view (e.g., food and drinks consumed by the participants to the ceremony; Romano 2019). The archaeological evidence shows the coexistence of different funerary practices, with e.g. the coeval presence of sub-pavement graves and of burials in cemetery, as noted by several scholars (e.g., Hall - Wooley 1927; Woolley 1934; Postgate 1980; Martin 1988). In this frame of high variability, the orientation of the graves was regarded as casual in most of the cases. However, defining the orientation of graves as random based, though not impossible, might hide difficulties in determining “what the controlling factors were, rather than that the gravedigger made an arbitrary decision according to a passing whim” (Rahtz 1978: 2)

The idea behind the present paper is derived from the evidence coming from funerary contexts excavated by the author at Abu Tbeirah. The excavations carried out at Abu Tbeirah since 2012 brought to light the remains of ca. 28 individuals from grave contexts and some sparse remains, due both to intentional and post-depositional dislocation. The graves excavated up to now are mainly dated to the ED/Akk. transition. These burials are attesting an interesting wide spectrum of practices. One of the aspects observed during the excavations is the apparent western preference in the orientation of the inhumed bodies (Romano 2019).

Aiming at verifying the validity of the tendency highlighted at Abu Tbeirah, a survey of the contemporary 3rd mill. BC funerary evidence from other sites is here performed, considering also the inhumations from Ur (Woolley 1934), Ubaid (Hall - Woolley 1927), Fara (Martin 1988), Abu Salalbikh (Martin et al. 1985), Khafaja (Delougaz et al. 1967).

The data presented in this preliminary survey might led in the future to a more in-depth archaeo-astronomical study that will better clarify the reasons behind the highlighted preferred orientation. Notwithstanding the necessity of further analyses, after the survey, an interpretation of the reasons behind the trends and tendencies highlighted will be tentatively proposed, taking into consideration our knowledge of ancient Sumerian beliefs on the afterlife.

 

METHODS

In general, as summarized by Rahtz 1978 and Kurila 2013, the orientations of the graves can be rarely casual or more often determined by several factors (alone or in combination):

- Individual aspects such as gender, age, origin, occupation, social status, rank, cause of death, or on the base of a judgment on the moral behavior during life of the inhumed, etc.;

- Movement of celestial bodies (sun, moon, stars);

- Presence of natural elements;

- Presence of other structures such as burials, monuments, sacred buildings, houses;

- Religious beliefs.

In the following sections a schematic representation of graves orientation is reported for each considered site. The orientation reported is that of the body and not of the grave. However, while the shape and orientation of earth-pits simply dug into the soil might have been influenced by soil conditions or being altered by post-depositional factors, the orientation of the grave chamber should be considered potentially meaningful.

In determining the orientation of the skeletons, the head was considered as the main pointing element on the basis of some considerations. The head was in general charged of peculiar meaning in Mesopotamia, identifying the individual himself. Cutting someone else head was the maximum desecrating act against a corpse or a statue (see e.g. Dolce 2018). On the contrary skull removal practices and secondary burial of skulls or of entire skeletons are attested at Abu Tbeirah and in several Mesopotamian contexts, though often interpreted as proof of ancient looting (see e.g. Woolley 1934: 200). The peculiar care (or hate) surrounding the detached head of an individual makes this body part as more suitable in representing the individual himself and possibly in determining the direction in which the life after the death will continue. Though it cannot be completely excluded that the orientation of a corpse was defined by the position of the feet, the extreme variety of the way in which corpses were deposed (in extended, semi-flexed or fetal positions) makes this hypothesis less likely. Anyway, though the orientation dictated by the head is emphasized here, the diagrams presented might be easily interpreted ideally prolonging the line towards the sector of the compass opposite to the head and thus considering the direction determined by the feet.

In order to reproduce the intended direction of the inhumations and not the accidental one caused by changes due to post-depositional alteration of the original position, only the graves and skeletons with a good degree of preservation and/or clear orientation were included in the study. It is important to stress that the graphic representation should be considered as illustrative: the position in the scheme is derived from the illustrations and the reports by the excavators, without further adjustments of the orientation. Only the graves with a published plan were considered and the chronological and spatial subdivision was maintained as far as possible. It should also be noted, in particular for Ubaid graves, that in some cases the orientation reported in the description was different from that on the plan (e.g., Ubaid G.68 and 70): in such cases, the second one was preferred.

Several sites will not be considered in detail due to the lack of precise information but are however remarkable in the frame of a complete analyses of the inhumation practices of the period. Tell Uqair cemetery, discovered immediately under the surface in the south-eastern lower part of Mound B, is an interesting evidence of an ED cemetery with graves “dug at random into the ruins of earlier private houses” (Lloyd - Safar 1943: 136): the abandonment of the area and the modification of its use might be linked with the “canals” full of sand cutting the remains of the ED occupation on the top of the mound (Lloyd - Safar 1943: 136).

Kish evidence (Mackay 1925; 1929) was not added due to the absence of published plans. However, it should be mentioned here that Mackay (1925: 12) summarized as follow the orientations of the bodies discovered in Cemetery A: 12 with the heads towards N; 4 towards NW; 27 towards W; 14 towards SW; 13 towards S; 8 towards SE; 6 towards E; 7 towards NE.

Other two cases should be considered beyond those presented below: the earlier ED I evidence from Ahmad Al-Hattū (Sürenhagen 1979; 1980; 1981; Eickoff 1987; 1993) and Kheit Qasim (Forest 1980). Some of the built graves from Kheit Qasim show on the west side two/four small parallel walls: it is not clear if these walls were the inner supports for an earthen ramp, but their position on the west side is quite peculiar. Moreover, the skeletons found in connection inside Kheit Qasim built graves are all oriented with the head toward W, while the bodies discovered in the multiple graves from Ahmad Al-Hattū have all the head toward SW.

 

GRAVE ORIENTATION IN ED/AKK MESOPOTAMIAN SITES

Abu Tbeirah

Abu Tbeirah excavations are bringing to light a highly differentiated repertoire of funerary practices: beyond the presence of burials within the household environment and in cemetery, simple and double inhumations in simple pits or in sarcophagus, secondary inhumations and post-mortem manipulation of skeletons are attested as well (Romano 2019: 68ff).

 

Fig. 1 - Grave orientations at Abu Tbeirah. The small square indicates the position of the head.

 

Fig. 1 reports the orientation of all the graves found at Abu Tbeirah. In the SE part of the site (Area 1) sub-pavement inhumations belonging to the two phases of occupation of a huge household (Building A) have been brought to light. The structures of the household were cut in the latest phase of the area by garbage pits and graves interpreted as belonging to a Cemetery (Romano 2019). The evidences related to the gradual abandonment of the area that led to the interpretation of these later graves as belonging to a cemeterial rather than a household context are summarized in Romano 2019: 66-68. The situation highlighted in Area 1 might potentially be comparable to that of Tell Uqair (Lloyd - Safar 1943).

In the NE part of the site (Area 2) instead the domestic structures of the end of 3rd mill. BC were cut by several graves (one of them particularly rich), in turn strongly disturbed by later activities, possibly belonging to a now eroded upper phase (D’Agostino – Romano 2015). The skeletons were preserved only inside Graves 101 and 102.

Area 1 cemetery graves are mostly with the head pointing toward the western arc. Building A phase 1 and 2 sub-pavement graves are aligned with the walls of the structure that is oriented with the corners towards the cardinal points, as typical for houses in arid regions (Shepperson 2017). Nevertheless, a general prevalence of the orientation with the head toward the western horizon is also evident for the sub-pavement graves of the household. The only two graves discovered in Area 2 are also with the head oriented to the W. In addition, also the donkey burial discovered here is oriented with the head toward SW (D’Agostino et al. 2015; Alhaique et al. 2019). On the contrary, the dog skeleton, deposed without head inside Building A Room 22, is instead oriented toward NE (Alhaique 2019).

 

Ur

Regarding the orientation of the graves in the Royal Cemetery of Ur, Woolley states that: “Where the body can lie indifferently in any one of four directions (these four being in fact multiplied by all the minor variations which it seems best to disregard) there can be no religious principle determining its orientation” (Woolley 1934: 141). Beyond the published graves, also “Woolley's Field Note Cards” from http://www.ur-online.org were considered.

 

Fig. 2 - Grave orientations at Ur. The small square indicates the position of the head. For the sake of clarity of the graphic representation, graves belonging to the same phase of the cemetery were divided in different diagrams.

 

If compared to other sites, Ur (Fig. 2) differs for the presence in graves of several bodies, often deposed with different orientation. Also Khafaja presents a similar evidence, but in a reduced and in a less “spectacular” way. In general, most of the bodies at Ur are oriented with the head toward NW, with a consistent group with the head pointing toward SW.

 

Ubaid

Fig. 3 - Grave orientations at Ubaid. The small square indicates the position of the head.

 

Ubaid graves were interpreted by Woolley as belonging to a proper cemetery and he affirmed that: “no significance attaches to the orientation of bodies” (Hall – Wooley 1927: 174). Lately, H. Martin in her re-evaluation of Ubaid graves stated that: “graves at Ubaid had a very regular orientation along NW-SE and NE-SW axes; this is easily explained if the graves had been excavated from houses with walls following the usual NE-SW, NW-SE orientation found in Mesopotamia. Graves excavated within houses at other sites (Khafaja, Abu Salabikh, Fara) usually align with the house walls in this fashion. Any such Early Dynastic houses were either completely eroded away or missed in the excavations” (Martin 1982: 146-147).

In the diagram in Fig. 3 only the graves with a published plan were reported. Moreover, for the case in which the orientation in the description made by Woolley was in contrast with the plan, the orientation from the latter was taken into consideration, as said above. The scheme is based on the chronological subdivision made by Martin (1982). In considering Obeid graves, the interpretation made by Woolley will be maintained: the evidence from Ur with the bodies oriented along NW-SE and NE-SW axes makes this element unsuitable in discerning sub-pavement graves from the cemetery ones.

 

Fara

The main source of information on the excavation carried out at Fara is the reassessment made by H. Martin (1988). According to Martin (1988: 107) “the burials seem to follow the orientation of the walls of the houses in which they were dug”. Fig. 4 shows that most of the graves are oriented toward the western horizon, though N, NNE and SSE orientations are attested as well. However, four graves contrasts with this picture, showing an orientation toward west. In addition, G.23 is oriented toward N.

 

Fig. 4 - Grave orientations at Fara. The small square indicates the position of the head.

 

Abu Salabikh

Abu Salabikh graves were all sub-pavement inhumations and N. Postgate interprets their orientations as the result of the alignment with the structures below which they were realized: “there are no firm rules governing the orientation of the head: on the other hand, the body rarely lies toward one of the modern cardinal points of the compass. We doubt that this has much significance: the alignment of the body is of course determined by the orientation of the grave-chamber and this in turn is related to the walls of the room from which (in some cases at least) the grave-shaft was dug” (Postgate 1980: 69).

Fig. 5 shows indeed a certain variety with some graves oriented toward the NE and SE and a concentration of inhumations toward NNW and SSW. However, the graves with the head oriented toward the western horizon are well distributed along the arc from N to S.

 

Fig. 5 - Grave orientations at Abu Salabikh. The small square indicates the position of the head.

 

Khafaja

Fig. 6 considers all the graves attributed to the ED period, belonging to Houses 10 to 1. Delougaz et al. (1967) describe the graves as dug from the living surfaces inside the buildings, showing often no trace of the cut on the floor due to the continue occupation and use of the houses. Some of the burials were simply dug under the floor surface while others were built with plano-convex mudbricks and in some cases in bricks. Apart from four graves oriented toward the due west, all the others are grouped in the four directions dictated by the walls of the buildings. It must be considered that the construction of the houses around the walls of the Oval Temple affected the layout of some rooms and this resulted in the adaptation of some graves to the existing layout (see for example Grave 110 under room 6 of House XL in Houses 4). In addition, some further elements might have influenced the orientation, mitigating the actual difference with the other inhumed bodies: the skeletons of 108, 116, 125 are deposed in built chambers oriented according to the structure, while skeleton 119B was deposed in the space between a built grave chamber (119A) and one wall of the structure. Grave 124 and 143 are the only evident exceptions.

 

Fig. 6 - Graves orientation at Khafaja. The small square indicates the position of the head.

 

RESULTUS AND DISCUSSION

Analysis of the data

Including both cemeterial and sub-pavement inhumations, the evidence presented above suggests that, notwithstanding a degree of expected variability, most of the graves considered (70%) were realized deposing the bodies with the head toward the western horizon (or on the contrary with the feet toward the eastern one) as summarized in Figs 7-8. Pending further and more accurate archaeoastronomical research, only a wide subdivision of the orientations was carried out, though a more accurate distinction in the orientation would possibly lead to further meaningful grouping. However, the patterns highlighted for each site in Figs 7 and 8 allow some general considerations.

Starting from the sub-pavement graves, it could be argued that these were in general realized following the structures (see e.g. the interpretation given by Martin for Fara graves quoted above) that, as common in arid regions, were usually oriented with the corners toward the cardinal points, in order to optimize the inner thermal conditions (Shepperson 2017). The picture delineated from Khafaja (see also Fig. 6) shows indeed a quite clear concentration of the graves in the directions set by the presence of the structures, considering also the curve layout imposed to the buildings by the presence of the Oval Temple. Ubaid, Abu Salabikh and Fara show the same concentration on the NE-SW and NW-SE axes but with an apparently more even distribution of the graves in the western horizon. In all the contexts there is however a predominance of west oriented graves.

 

Fig. 7 - Graphic representation showing the orientations of all the bodies for each site subdivided on the basis of the context. The small square indicates the position of the head.

 

As far as the graves orientation in cemetery is concerned, beyond the homogeneous evidence from the site of Ahmad al-Hattū and Kheit Qasim (see above §1) and the less regular one from Kish (49% toward the western horizon; 24% toward the eastern one; 13% and 14% respectively toward N and S), the patterns highlighted from Abu Tbeirah, Obeid and Ur (Fig. 7) are highly divergent. Ur pattern seems to be not only quite similar to that of Kish but also of Khafaja, showing in a way a higher regularity. This might be obviously due to the difference in numbers or in the social status of the population inhumed in the contexts of Abu Tbeirah and Obeid. Also the presence of built chambers, especially those containing a high number of inhumed bodies, influences this picture.

Notwithstanding this, other factors might have played an important role in the realization of Ur burials. While Abu Tbeirah and Obeid cemetery burials are quite well distributed on the western horizon, at Ur most of the graves are oriented with the head toward NNW. In this case it should be considered the possibility that the realization of private graves in Ur, the city of the moon-god, was based on the presence of an important focal point NNW of the cemeterial area: the complex dedicated to Nanna/Sin and later to the Ziqqurat.

 

Fig. 8 - Histograms showing the distribution of bodies orientation in cemeteries and sub-pavement burial for each site; pie-charts showing the total percentage of bodies orientation for each direction from all the considered contexts.

 

The presence of a second group of burials oriented towards SW is also worth noting. This evidence might be even more meaningful, if the spectacular evidence of the two most famous Royal graves is also considered: the Great death Pit and Puabi’s tomb and the associated death Pit (Fig. 9).

 

Fig. 9 - Body orientation inside Ur PG/1237 (“The Greath Dead Pit”) and PG/800 (Puabi’s Grave).

 

As already highlighted by M. Vidale (2011: 428) the plan of the Greath Death Pit (PG 1237) loses clarity but acquires more significance if oriented after its cardinal points: apart from the six soldiers (Vidale 2011: 446) located at the entrance with the head toward NE, all the accompanying deads had their head towards SW.

Inside PG/800 Puabi’s skeleton was laying with the head toward WSW. The other bodies were all located in the access pit. P. Zimmerman (1998: 39) highlighted some inconsistencies in Woolley’s attribution of the death pit to this grave and proposed to attribute it to a later not preserved grave (see also the reconstruction reported at https://www.penn.museum/blog/museum/ur-project-october-2014/). The position of the bodies found here by Woolley is interesting. Leaving aside the not well-preserved skeletons near the chariot, five bodies, to be interpreted as guards (Wooley 1934: 74), were lying in a dromos with the head toward SE. Most of the accompanying bodies were in the bigger shaft, oriented NE-SW and were deposed in connection with the remains of a chariot. The corpses laying in two parallel rows had the head respectively toward NW and SE. The ground-surface of this part of the pit “was flat but sloped down a little-perhaps half a metre in all-from the north-east to the south-west” (Woolley 1934: 73). The picture delineated by Woolley seems to correspond to a sort of imaginary funerary procession (descending?) toward SW. In this case not the orientation of the single body but the ensemble of the scene should be considered, an exception fully justified by the singularity of the context. Whether or not this death pit belonged to Puabi’s grave, it is singular that the inhumed body of the woman was lying with the head toward the same direction of the procession of the possibly later grave. This element seems to reinforce again the idea that is the head to define the orientation in Mesopotamian graves.

 

From the grave to the Netherworld

The grave is a fundamental element in the journey of the dead to the underworld. In order to understand if the orientation of the grave is meaningful in the frame of the beliefs of 3rd millennium BC Sumer, the first point to be addressed is: where is the Sumerian Netherworld located? D. Katz summarizes as follow the possible locations of the underworld according to cuneiform sources (Katz 2003: 47): “(i) directly under the ground to its full extent […]; (2) deeply underground […]; (3) somewhere in the west where Shamash descends or on the route eastward; (4) maybe in the north-eastern Zagros mountains, as suggested both by the term kur and the description of the netherworld as a mountain […] The last two possibilities are not completely contradictory”. The co-presence, especially for the 3rd mill. BC of several beliefs might fit well with the high variety of graves orientation highlighted in the data presented above.

In addition, about the two opposed routes toward east and W, Katz convincedly demonstrates that these are: “two different theological attitudes to the netherworld, the one reflected in southern Sumerian texts that point to the east, and the other prevalent in Old Babylonian sources that point to the west” (Katz 2003: 51). The contemporary diffusion of several beliefs during the 3rd millennium BC is overcome in the second millennium BC when Shamash becomes “the judge over the dead and the netherworld is commonly associated with the mythological ‘sunset’” (Katz 2003: 53). In Mesopotamian mythology the sun god Utu/Shamash possesses, indeed, strong chthonic aspects, a characteristic that is further emphasized in the west Semitic pantheon where the solar deity is considered as psychopomp (Sedláček 2015: 193). Utu/Shamash’s role in the judgment of the dead is attested since the Old Babylonian period and it is testified by his epithet "judge of those above and below" (Heimpel 1986; Horowitz 1998; Katz 2005). Moreover, the sun seems to have played an important role in the access to the realms of the afterlife. In “Gilgamesh, Enkidu and the Netherworld” (George 2003), the God Enki helps Gilgamesh through Utu/Shamash: the sun-god opens the gates of the Netherworld, bringing Enkidu with him. Though a role in the judgment of dead is attested also for the moon-god Nannar/Suen and other deities, Shamash remains as the one that presides the “netherworld tribunal” (Steinkeller 2005: 15 and passim).

The passage highlighted by Katz form one belief to the other was obviously not a radical but a gradual one, though not widely reflected in cuneiform sources (see e.g. Lu’utu inscription about the construction of Ereshkigal temple at Umma reported always in Katz 2003). It can be supposed that the changing beliefs documented by the cuneiform sources were instead more visible in the life of normal people and might find an earlier evidence in the variety of orientation of the 3rd millennium BC graves.

Comparing the evidence presented above with the location of the netherworld attested by the texts and considering the head as main element in determining the direction of an inhumed body, the following picture can be derived:

i-ii. underground or deeply underground: the depth of the graves is high variable and depending on several factors, including the difference due to the cemeterial or household context; obviously all the graves considered can be connected to these beliefs;

iii.a somewhere on the W (sunset): it corresponds to the 68% of the bodies inhumed in cemeteries and to the 75% of those in the sub-pavement graves (70% if both contexts are considered);

iii.b somewhere on the east (sunrise): it corresponds to the 26% of the bodies inhumed in cemeteries and to the 21% of those in the sub-pavement graves (24% if both contexts are considered);

iv. toward the Zagros at NE (kur): it corresponds to the 15% of the bodies inhumed in cemeteries and to the 9% of those in the sub-pavement graves (13% if both contexts are considered); this can be considered a subcase of iiib.In this way most of the graves might be considered consistent with the attested beliefs, except for a small percentage of graves oriented toward S and N, respectively the 5% and 1% of the record. It must be however significant that most of the graves in cemeteries and under the floor surfaces of the houses are oriented toward W.

 

On the preferred western orientation

In the attempt of pushing forward the analysis carried out here, the evidence from the cemeteries will be considered in deeper detail. Indeed, though a general preference for the western horizon is evident also from sub-pavement burials (75%), in the houses the presence of structures surely imposed physical constrains to the orientation of the graves. On the contrary the inhumations in cemeteries were surely realized with a greater freedom: without constrains, cemetery might be more helpful in understanding the beliefs at the basis of the chosen orientation.

The cemeterial contexts analyzed can be roughly divided in two groups: 1. Cemeteries in which there is a striking preference for the western horizon (Kheit Qasim, Ahmad al-Hattu, Obeid, Abu Tbeirah); 2. Cemeteries in which the bodies are oriented along the NW-SE and NE-SW axes with the heads pointing to the western or to the eastern horizon (Ur and Kish), but always with a higher number of western oriented graves (thus with a pattern similar to that highlighted for the households).

Looking at the cemeteries of the first group, though the detailed information is limited to the graves of Obeid and Abu Tbeirah, it is interesting to note the distribution on the western horizon of the graves. In these regards some hypothesis might be tentatively proposed as a base for future analyses.

If the orientation toward W was related to the sunset, it might be possible that the changes in the direction of the graves in cemeteries were directly related with actual setting of the sun. In general, the identification of the sun (or of the moon) as principal factor in the spatial orientation of graves should be based on a good distribution on the western horizon (Brown 1993b: 323) derived from a “moving focal point” (see as comparisons Kurila 2013 for Lithuanian Graves). Indeed, the sun, as well as the moon, changes its setting position on the western horizon during the year (SW during the Winter; W during spring and autumn, NW during the Summer). Sumerians were aware of the path followed by the sun, rising in the E and setting to the W (Sedláček 2015; on the cosmic geography see also Ramazzotti 2009). The place reached by the sun (and the moon) after dusk is however controversial (see e.g. Heimpel 1986; Horowitz 1998; Katz 2005; Sedláček 2015; Steinkeller 2005): according to some scholars the two gods reach the netherworld, while others propose that the two gods stay at the gates/limits of heavens, where they proceed to the judgment of the dead. Though cuneiform sources regarding the movement of the celestial bodies are later than 3rd millennium BC, the terms for rising and setting are indeed used in several texts in order to indicate the two cardinal points (Horowitz 1998: 196). Moreover, in the MUL.APIN the movement of the sun toward S and toward N is described as happening respectively after the Summer and the Winter solstice (Horowitz 1998: 196).

Nevertheless, if the present solar path diagram at Abu Tbeirah is considered (Fig. 10) and compared with the orientation of the graves of the cemeteries of the second group, most of the northernmost and southernmost graves fall outside the arc defined by the changing position of the sun on the horizon. The situation does not change also if the modifications in the obliquity of the ecliptic are considered: “the width of the sunrise and sunset arc as viewed from any given terrestrial location was somewhat wider in the last few millennia than it is now. Compared with the shifts in stellar rising and setting positions due to precession, the differences are small: for example, in tropical zones around 2500 BC, the sun rose and set approximately its own diameter (0.5) further N at the June solstice, and the same amount further S at the December solstice, than now (Ruggles 2015b: 479).

 

 

Fig. 10 - Present annual solar path at Abu Tbeirah. Satellite imagery courtesy e-GEOS. Diagram modified from http://andrewmarsh.com/apps/staging/sunpath3d.html (© Dr. Andrew J. Marsh 2014).

 

However, the case of the graves considered here should not be compared with monumental structures, such as e.g. the Ziqqurat, that can be the result of more detailed and accurate observation of the sky by Sumerians (see Nadali - Polcaro 2016). A modern precision in the orientation should not be expected in dealing with the common Sumerian funerary practices and in particular with the simple graves dug into the soil. A complex system of factors may have played an important role: beyond the aspects listed above, also the characteristics of the excavated soil, the moment of the day in which the pit was realized, the sky visibility (e.g., presence of clouds) as well as the individual perception or accuracy should be considered.

The analysis of the second group shows that the orientation along the NW-SE and NE-SW axes, though apparently fitting well with the presence of buildings oriented as toward the cardinal points, cannot be considered as key criterion for discerning sub-pavement burials from cemetery ones. This is obviously valid if further proofs of the presence of later eroded structures or activities are not present. At Abu Salabikh the presence of later activities, cutting from above the stratigraphy, testify the continuity of occupation of the area and allow the attribution of the graves discovered immediately under the surface to later not preserved structures (Postgate in Martin, H.P. et al. 1995: 4-6 and passim). On the contrary, at Abu Tbeirah the gradual abandonment of the area is testified by the reuse of the area and of some rooms as dump, activity followed by the excavations of at least some of the graves (Romano 2019: 66-68). A similar situation might be that described by Lloyd in Uqair: here the ED houses on the top of Mound B were cut by canals full of sands, testifying a change in use of the area, while in the lower part of the hill several graves were found cutting the earlier structures (Lloyd - Safar 1943).

The pattern of the second group is comparable to that of the sub-pavement burials and it is similar to that highlighted for Obeid graves and interpreted as follow by Kopanias and Barlagianni (forth.): “In our sample, the graves and the bodies did not always have the same orientation; nevertheless, they are almost always aligned according to the course of the sun, since they were placed with their feet to the W and head to the E, or vice versa”. This interpretation is comparable to an interesting theory by Rahtz (1978). He proposes for other contexts a “solar arc model”, based on the moment in which the sun is observed, including e.g. morning, noon or the early afternoon. Rahtz (1978: 3) writes: “At the Wadi Halfa in the Sudan a solar orientation of a Mesolithic cemetery is apparently demonstrable (heads to W), but here although (with the exception of one apparent aberrant) the most northerly burial corresponds with the summer solstice at 65°, the rest of the range extends well S of the winter solstice at 115°, so a sunrise or sunset model is excluded. If on the other hand an early morning to early afternoon time is chosen to observe the sun's direction, then not only can most of the burials be included but even the apparent aberrant northerly one. In this latitude at the summer solstice period the sun passes overhead, not to the S, but at high noon crosses N of overhead. This is the solar traverse model rather than that of sunrise or sunset”.

This wider model, clearly represented by the second group of cemeteries and by the sub-pavement burials, fits well with the “horizontal perspective” highlighted by Katz (2005: 53-54) associating E and W in defining the cosmos. The graves of the first group and also the general preference of the orientation toward the western horizon seem to point at dusk as preferred moment (or direction) for the inhumation. This should correspond to the “vertical perspective” based on the strong relationship between the setting and the netherworld evident in the later Mesopotamian cuneiform sources. This perspective is indeed exemplified by an Old Babylonian incantation describing the evil spirit’s passage to the netherworld as “the gate of sunset” and indicating its location in the grave (Katz 2005: 44).

 

CONCLUDING REMARKS

The absence of a standard procedure in the orientations of bodies in graves is well connected with the presence of multiple funerary practices and beliefs. This variety is in general interpreted, from a socio-historical perspective, as evidence of “striking intracommunity distinctions” (Pollock 1999: 206) during the second half of the 3rd mill. BC, a period of dramatic social, cultural and economic changes (Laneri 2007). Beyond the evolution from a city state organization of Mesopotamia, with a diffuse leadership, to the edification of the Sargonic empire, this period of important changes is characterized, according to Pollock (1999: 208), by “tensions between oikoi on the one hand and kin-based households on the other”, well represented in the different deposition of the dead in cemetery or in houses and possibly in the differences in the placement of corpse. It is surely intriguing that the orientations of the bodies in the most famous and rich graves of the Royal Cemetery of Ur differ from the main group of NW burials. Is this a symptom of “ideological and political struggles” (Pollock 1991; Cohen 2005; Pollock 2007), with “tombs producing and displaying household identities and affiliations through their specific ritual practices” (Pollock 2007: 210)?

The presence of a preferred, but not unique western orientation might be evidence of these tensions and of negotiation of identity among social actors, played on the ground of their religious beliefs. This preliminary survey of ED/Akk. evidence revealed the potentiality of the study of grave orientations though further researches and new evidences from the excavations are obviously needed to verify the hypothesis of a connection of the orientation with the solar path and/or with the sunset. Furthermore, the use of Artificial Neural Nets might further contribute to the validation and interpretation of the highlighted pattern (see e.g. Ramazzotti 2012; 2016; 2018). The western oriented graves from Kheit Qasim and Ahamad al Hattu, earlier than Abu Tbeirah (EDIII/Akk.) and Obeid (EDII/Akk.) graves considered here, might be the reflection of the northern beliefs as defined by Katz (2005: 54-55). The later graves belonging both to cemetery and household contexts might hide, behind the high percentage of western oriented graves, the passage from the horizontal to the vertical system of beliefs, from an access to the netherworld located or in the E or in the W to a preference for the identification of the gates to the afterlife in the direction where the sun sets.

 

AKNOWLEDGMENTS

I acknowledge here my deep appreciation to Andrea Polcaro for his invaluable advices and help in writing this preliminary study. I also thank the anonymous reviewers whose comments have greatly improved this paper.

 

REFERENCES

Alhaique, F. (2019) Faunal Remains. In: Romano, L. - D’Agostino, F. (eds) Abu Tbeirah Excavations I. Area 1 Last Phase and Building A – Phase 1 (= Materiali e Documenti 44), Rome: Sapienza Università Editrice, 419-438.

Alhaique, F. et al. (2019) A Sumerian equid burial from Abu Tbeirah (Southern Iraq). In: De Grossi Mazzorin, J., Fiore, I., Minniti, C. (eds) Atti dell’8° Convegno Nazionale di Archeozoologia Lecce, 11-14 novembre 2015, Lecce: Università del Salento, 255-258.

Alhaique F. et al. (in press a) Cibo per i morti e cibo per i vivi, una prospettiva dalla Meopotamia meridionale all’alba della storia. In: Preistoria del cibo. Atti della 50ma Riunione Scientifica dell’Istituto Italiano di Preistoria e Protostoria.

Alhaique, F. et al. (in press b) Vita quotidiana e morte ad Abu Tbeirah (Iraq Meridionale) nel III millennio a.C.: dati preliminari dalle faune dell’area 1. In: Atti del Seminario ISMEO “Archeologia del Cibo. Il contributo delle Missioni Italiane ed Internazionali in Africa e Asia”, 26 maggio 2016, Roma.

Brown, M.A. (1993) Grave Orientation: A Further View. Archaeological Journal, 140, 322-328.

Cohen, A.C. (2005) Death Rituals, Ideology, and the Development of Early Mesopotamian Kingship: Toward a New Understanding of Iraq’s Royal Cemetery of Ur (= Studies in Ancient Magic and Divination 7), Leiden: Brill.

Croucher, K. (2015) Life and Death in Late Prehistoric to Early Historic Mesopotamia In: Renfrew, C., Boyd, M., Morley, I. (eds) Death Rituals, Social Order and the Archaeology of Immortality in the Ancient World: 'Death Shall Have No Dominion'. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 223-236.

D’Agostino, F. et al. (2015) Abu Tbeirah, Nasiriyah (Southern Iraq). Preliminary Report on the 2013 Excavation Campaign. In: Biga, M.G. et al. (eds) Homenaje a Mario Liverani, fundador de una ciencia nueva (II)/Omaggio a Mario Liverani, fondatore di una nuova scienza (II) (= ISIMU 13), Madrid 2011(2015), 209-221.

Delougaz, P. et al. (1967) Private Houses and Graves in the Diyala Region (=OIP 88), Chicago.

Eickoff, T. (1987) Begräbnistätten in der Nekropole von Tall Ahmed al-attu/Hamrin. In: Jean-Louis Huot, J.-L. (ed.) Préhistoire de la Mésopotamie. La Mésopotamie préhistorique et l’exploration récente du Djebel Hamrin, Paris, 17-19 décembre 1984 (=Colloque international du CNRS), Paris: CNRS Éditions, 475-487.

Eickoff, T. (1993) Grab und Beigabe. Bestattungsstätten der Nekropole von Tall Ahmad al Hattu un anderer frühdinastischer Begräbnisstätten im südlichen Mesopotamien und in Luristan (=MVS 14), München.

Forest J.-D. (1980) Kheit Qasim I. Un cimetière du début du troisième millénaire dans la vallée de Hamrin, Iraq. Paléorient,6, 213-220.

George, A.R. (2003) The Babylonian Gilgamesh Epic: Introduction, Critical Edition and Cuneiform Texts, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hall, H.R. – Woolley, L. (1927) Ur Excavations Vol 1 Al-'Ubaid, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Heimpel, W. (1986) The Sun at Night and the Doors of Heaven in Babylonian Texts. Journal of Cuneiform Studies, 38, 127-151.

Horowitz, W. (1998) Mesopotamian Cosmic Geography (=Mesopotamian Civilizations 8), Winona Lake, Eisenbrauns.

Katz, D. (2005) Death They Dispensed to Mankind: The Funerary World of Ancient Mesopotamia. Historiae, 2, 55-90.

Kopanias, K., Barlagianni, G. (forth.) Unequal in Life but Equal in Death? The Mortuary Evidence for Social Stratification in the Ubaid Polities. Ash Sharq. Bulletin of the Ancient Near East 3(1).

Kuijt, I. (1996) Negotiating Equality through Ritual: A Consideration of Late Natufian and Prepottery Neolithic A Period Mortuary Practices. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 15, 313-336.

Kurila, L. (2013) Some Remarks on the Orientation of the Dead: Examples from Two EastLithuanian Barrow Cemeteries. Estonian Journal of Archaeology, 17, 1, 38-56.

Laneri, N. (2007) Burial Practices at Titris, Hoyuk, Turkey: An Interpretation. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 66, 241-266.

Lloyd, S., Safar, F. (1943) Tell Uqair Excavations by the Iraq Government Directorate of Antiquities in 1940 and 1941. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 2, 131-158.

Mackay, E. (1925) Report on the Excavation of the "A" Cemetery at Kish, Mesopotamia, Pt. 1, Chicago: Field Museum.

Mackay, E. (1929) A Sumerian Palace and the "A" Cemetery, Pt. 2, Chicago: Field Museum.

Martin, H.P. (1982) The Early Dynastic Cemetery at al-'Ubaid, a Re-Evaluation. Iraq, Vol. 44, 145-185.

Martin, H.P. (1988) Fara: A Reconstruction of the Ancient Mesopotamian City of Shuruppak, Birmingham.

Martin, H.P. et al. (1995) Abu Salabikh Excavations 2. Graves 1 to 99, London.

Nadali, D., Polcaro, A. (2016) The Sky from the High Terrace: Study on the Orientation of the Ziqqurat in Ancient Mesopotamia. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, 16, 4, 103-108.

Pollock, S. (1991) Of Priestesses, Princes and Poor Relations: The Dead in the Royal Cemetery of Ur. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 1, 2, 171-189.

Pollock, S. (1999) Ancient Mesopotamia. The Eden that Never Was, Cambridge: Cambridge University press.

Pollock, S. (2007) Death of a Household. In: Laneri, N. (ed.) Performing Death. Social Analyses of Funerary Traditions in the Ancient Near East and Mediterranean (=OIS 3), Chicago: The University of Chicago, 209-222.

Postgate, N. (1980) Early Dynastic Burial Customs at Abu Salabikh. Sumer,36, 65-82.

Rahtz, P. (1978) Grave Orientation. Archaeological Journal, 135, 1-14.

Ramazzotti, M. (2009) A Presage of Heresy. Metaphysical Notes and Iconographic Themes for an Archaeology of the Mesopotamian Skies. In: Galluzzi, P. (ed.), Galileo. Images of the Universe from Antiquity to the Telescope, Firenze: Giunti Editore, 54-65.

Ramazzotti, M. (2016) Introduzione all’archeologia del paesaggio. Geografia cosmica, simulazioni geomatiche, ricostruzioni potenziali e ipersuperfici neurali. In: Celani, S. (a cura di) Digital Humanities: strumento o fine? Elementi per una riflessione metodologica (=Status Quaestionis X), Rome, 99-113.

Ramazzotti, M. (2013) Where Were the Early Syrian Kings of Ebla Buried? The Ur-Eridu Survey Neural Model as an Artificial Adaptive System for the Probabilistic Localization of the Ebla Royal é madím. Scienze dell’Antichità, XIX, 10-34.

Ramazzotti, M. (2018) Landscape Archaeology and Artificial Intelligence: the Neural Hypersurface of the Mesopotamian Urban Revolution. In: Bigot Juloux, V., Gansell A.R., di Ludovico, A. (eds) CyberResearch on the Ancient Near East and Neighboring Regions. Case Studies on Archaeological Data, Objects, Texts, and Digital Archiving, Leiden-Boston: Brill, 60-82.

Rebay-Salisbury, K., Stig Sørensen, M.L. and Hughes, J. (2010) Body Parts and Bodies Whole: Introduction. In: Rebay-Salisbury, K., Stig Sørensen, M.L. and Hughes, J. (eds) Body Parts and Bodies Whole: Changing Relations and Meanings, Oxford: Oxbow Books, 1-5.

Romano, L. (2005) Simposio e banchetto nella Mesopotamia del Protodinastico (= Suppl. alla «Riv. degli studi orientali»), Rome: Fabrizio Serra Editore.

Romano, L. (2019) Abu Tbeirah and Area 1 in the Second Half of the 3rd Mill. BC. In: Romano, L. - D’Agostino, F. (eds) Abu Tbeirah Excavations I. Area 1 Last Phase and Building A – Phase 1 (= Materiali e Documenti 44), Rome: Sapienza Università Editrice, 59-92.

Ruggles, C.L.N. (2015a) Basic Concepts of Positional Astronomy. In: Ruggles, C.L.N. (ed.) Handbook of Archaeoastronomy and Ethnoastronomy, NewYork: Springer, 459-472.

Ruggles, C.L.N. (2015b) Long-Term Changes in the Appearance of the Sky. In: Ruggles, C.L.N. (ed.) Handbook of Archaeoastronomy and Ethnoastronomy, NewYork: Springer, 473-483.

Sedláček, T. (2015) The Rising of the Sun-God as A Mythological Motif: Old Akkadian Seals in Relation to the Gilgamesh Epic. Asian and African Studies, 24, 2, 190-210.

Shepperson, M. (2017) Sunlight and Shade in the First Cities. A Sensory Archaeology of Early Iraq, Göttingen-Bristol.

Steinkeller, P. (2005) Of Stars and Men: The Conceptual and Mythological Setup of Babylonian Extispicy. In: Gianto, A. (ed.) Biblical and Oriental Essays in Memory of William L. Moran (biblica et orientalia 48), Rome: Editrice Pontificio Istituto Biblico, 11-47.

Sürenhagen, D. (1979) Ahmad Al-Hattū 1978. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft zu Berlin 111, 35-50.

Sürenhagen, D. (1980) Die frühdynastisch I-zeitliche Nekropole von Tall Ahmad Al-Hattū. Ausgrabungen der deutschen Orient Gesellschaft im Hamrin-Becken. Paléorient 6, 229-232.

Sürenhagen, D. (1981) Ahmad Al-Hattū 1979/80.Mitteilungen der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft zu Berlin 113, 35-51.

Tafuri, M.A. (2019) The Human Remains. In: Romano, L. - D’Agostino, F. (eds) Abu Tbeirah Excavations I. Area 1 Last Phase and Building A – Phase 1 (= Materiali e Documenti 44), Rome: Sapienza Università Editrice, 389-418.

Vidale, M. (2011) PG 1237, Royal Cemetery of Ur: Patterns in Death. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 21, 427-451.

Woolley, L. (1934) Ur Excavations. vol. 2. The Royal Cemetery, London.

Zimmerman, P. (1998) Two Tombs or Three. In: R.L. Zettler – L. Horne (eds) Treasures from the Royal Tomb of Ur, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum, 39.